<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366059</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for a reduced rate of export duty on iron ore was rejected by the appellate tribunal. The tribunal determined that the appellant was not eligible for the reduced rate as the Let Export order, a crucial date for eligibility under the relevant notification, was issued before the effective date of the duty reduction. The lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366059</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for a reduced rate of export duty on iron ore was rejected by the appellate tribunal. The tribunal determined that the appellant was not eligible for the reduced rate as the Let Export order, a crucial date for eligibility under the relevant notification, was issued before the effective date of the duty reduction. The lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>