<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 90 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14231</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing deductions under section 57(iii) for interest payments on loans taken to discharge wealth-tax and income-tax liabilities. The Court held that the borrowals were for personal liabilities and not for earning income, emphasizing the requirement that expenses be wholly and exclusively for earning income under section 57(iii). The decision was reinforced by section 58(1)(a), which disallows personal expenses as deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 90 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14231</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing deductions under section 57(iii) for interest payments on loans taken to discharge wealth-tax and income-tax liabilities. The Court held that the borrowals were for personal liabilities and not for earning income, emphasizing the requirement that expenses be wholly and exclusively for earning income under section 57(iii). The decision was reinforced by section 58(1)(a), which disallows personal expenses as deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>