<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1527 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366055</link>
    <description>Used multi-function devices were held outside the compulsory registration order because the notified schedule covered printers, plotters, copying machines and duplicators, but not that distinct product category. The goods also could not be treated as hazardous waste on the reasoning adopted in the impugned order, since the relevant extended producer responsibility conditions were not operative for the imports in question. Although the goods remained restricted under the Foreign Trade Policy and were therefore liable to confiscation, the restriction was not an absolute prohibition; redemption for home consumption on payment of fine and duty remained available under the statutory scheme, with the redemption fine left for reconsideration on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1527 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366055</link>
      <description>Used multi-function devices were held outside the compulsory registration order because the notified schedule covered printers, plotters, copying machines and duplicators, but not that distinct product category. The goods also could not be treated as hazardous waste on the reasoning adopted in the impugned order, since the relevant extended producer responsibility conditions were not operative for the imports in question. Although the goods remained restricted under the Foreign Trade Policy and were therefore liable to confiscation, the restriction was not an absolute prohibition; redemption for home consumption on payment of fine and duty remained available under the statutory scheme, with the redemption fine left for reconsideration on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>