<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1524 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366052</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the entire disputed amount with interest to the appellant. The judgment clarified the application of limitation under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act in cases of mistaken payments where no levy was applicable, ensuring a just outcome for the appellant in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1524 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366052</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the entire disputed amount with interest to the appellant. The judgment clarified the application of limitation under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act in cases of mistaken payments where no levy was applicable, ensuring a just outcome for the appellant in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>