https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366044 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal concerning service tax liability on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim for a 75% abatement on freight charges paid to the GTA. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of proof that the appellant did not avail GTA services or obtain necessary declarations for claiming the abatement. Due to the lack of substantiating documentation and supporting evidence, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original tax liability. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:19:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366044 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal concerning service tax liability on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim for a 75% abatement on freight charges paid to the GTA. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of proof that the appellant did not avail GTA services or obtain necessary declarations for claiming the abatement. Due to the lack of substantiating documentation and supporting evidence, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366044