<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1515 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty unsustainable based on legal precedents and higher court judgments. The decision emphasized the settled interpretation of works contracts regarding service tax liability before a specific date, leading to the allowance of the appeal and relief for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1515 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty unsustainable based on legal precedents and higher court judgments. The decision emphasized the settled interpretation of works contracts regarding service tax liability before a specific date, leading to the allowance of the appeal and relief for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>