https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366040 The Revenue's appeal was treated as barred by the monetary limit policy because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold for filing appeals before the Tribunal. A subsequent clarification extended the same instruction to pending appeals before the High Court and CESTAT, so the matter did not require examination on merits. The appeal was therefore dismissed as not maintainable on account of the low tax effect. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:19:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366040 The Revenue's appeal was treated as barred by the monetary limit policy because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold for filing appeals before the Tribunal. A subsequent clarification extended the same instruction to pending appeals before the High Court and CESTAT, so the matter did not require examination on merits. The appeal was therefore dismissed as not maintainable on account of the low tax effect. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366040