<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1502 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366030</link>
    <description>Excess imported manganese ore originally procured for manufacture and mostly consumed in production was not treated as trading activity merely because the surplus was later sold. The analysis distinguished clearance of inputs as such from trading, noting that trading requires buying, stocking, storing and reselling goods as a commercial activity. As the record showed procurement for consumption and no finding that the goods were bought for trading or that the clearances constituted exempted services, no reversal or payment under the CENVAT Credit regime was warranted. The demand raised on a trading basis was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1502 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366030</link>
      <description>Excess imported manganese ore originally procured for manufacture and mostly consumed in production was not treated as trading activity merely because the surplus was later sold. The analysis distinguished clearance of inputs as such from trading, noting that trading requires buying, stocking, storing and reselling goods as a commercial activity. As the record showed procurement for consumption and no finding that the goods were bought for trading or that the clearances constituted exempted services, no reversal or payment under the CENVAT Credit regime was warranted. The demand raised on a trading basis was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>