<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1495 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to retain Cenvat Credit on tour operator services for staff transportation, emphasizing the relevance of such services to the manufacturing process and the broader interpretation of &quot;input services&quot; before 2011. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals, potentially resulting in consequential reliefs for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1495 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to retain Cenvat Credit on tour operator services for staff transportation, emphasizing the relevance of such services to the manufacturing process and the broader interpretation of &quot;input services&quot; before 2011. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals, potentially resulting in consequential reliefs for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>