<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1462 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for claiming exemption under Section 54/54F. Despite the incorrect claim, the Tribunal held that it did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Emphasizing that incorrect claims do not necessarily imply inaccuracies, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1462 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for claiming exemption under Section 54/54F. Despite the incorrect claim, the Tribunal held that it did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Emphasizing that incorrect claims do not necessarily imply inaccuracies, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>