https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274680 The appeal centered on the alleged non-payment of service tax liability and penalty recomputation. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed a 25% liability on the service provider for service tax, with the remaining 75% on the recipient. A recomputation of penalties under Section 78(1) was also ordered. The appellant's failure to specify grievances and the clear directions in the impugned order led to dismissal for prematurity and lack of merit. The appellant was advised to await the recomputation and pursue appellate remedy if dissatisfied. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:10:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274680 The appeal centered on the alleged non-payment of service tax liability and penalty recomputation. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed a 25% liability on the service provider for service tax, with the remaining 75% on the recipient. A recomputation of penalties under Section 78(1) was also ordered. The appellant's failure to specify grievances and the clear directions in the impugned order led to dismissal for prematurity and lack of merit. The appellant was advised to await the recomputation and pursue appellate remedy if dissatisfied. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274680