<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Due to Lack of Evidence in Tyre Smuggling Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41077</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 112 (a) of Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - In the absence of anything to indicate that appellant played any role in importing tyres in the guise of chappals, the provisions of Section 112 (a) of Customs Act, 1962 are not attracted</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:52:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Due to Lack of Evidence in Tyre Smuggling Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41077</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 112 (a) of Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - In the absence of anything to indicate that appellant played any role in importing tyres in the guise of chappals, the provisions of Section 112 (a) of Customs Act, 1962 are not attracted</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:52:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>