<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SEZ Unit&#039;s Service Tax Refund Claim Under Review Due to Ambiguity in Retainership Service Details and Tax Clarity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41074</link>
    <description>SEZ Unit - Refund claim - There is no service in the nature of “retainership service” - Unless the nature of the service rendered is clear and the service tax paid is also clear, it cannot be determined whether the appellant in this case will be entitled to refund of service tax or not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:06:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SEZ Unit&#039;s Service Tax Refund Claim Under Review Due to Ambiguity in Retainership Service Details and Tax Clarity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41074</link>
      <description>SEZ Unit - Refund claim - There is no service in the nature of “retainership service” - Unless the nature of the service rendered is clear and the service tax paid is also clear, it cannot be determined whether the appellant in this case will be entitled to refund of service tax or not.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:06:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>