<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1486 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274674</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the disallowance of the amount paid to the Employees&#039; Recreation Club under section 40A(9) of the Income-tax Act for A.Y. 2006-07. The tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for further examination to determine if the payment was a reimbursement or a general contribution, citing a similar judgment from the High Court of Mumbai. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision announced on 27.04.2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1486 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274674</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the disallowance of the amount paid to the Employees&#039; Recreation Club under section 40A(9) of the Income-tax Act for A.Y. 2006-07. The tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for further examination to determine if the payment was a reimbursement or a general contribution, citing a similar judgment from the High Court of Mumbai. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision announced on 27.04.2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>