https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274664 Penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustained because service tax on GTA services was not discharged within the due period and the interest component also remained unpaid. Later payment of the tax did not cure the default or remove the basis for penal action, so interference with the penalty was not justified. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274664 Penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustained because service tax on GTA services was not discharged within the due period and the interest component also remained unpaid. Later payment of the tax did not cure the default or remove the basis for penal action, so interference with the penalty was not justified. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274664