<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1252 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274667</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge and affirming the addition in manufacturing and trading results. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s use of the previous year&#039;s gross profit rate for income estimation, citing factors affecting gross margin fluctuations. The matter was reverted to the Assessing Officer for further assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department and imposing penalties under the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1252 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274667</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge and affirming the addition in manufacturing and trading results. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s use of the previous year&#039;s gross profit rate for income estimation, citing factors affecting gross margin fluctuations. The matter was reverted to the Assessing Officer for further assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the Department and imposing penalties under the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>