<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 86 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14219</link>
    <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held to have abated because the assessee had availed the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and obtained immunity in respect of the penalty liability. On that basis, the court dismissed the application, treating the settlement and immunity under the scheme as dispositive of the penalty dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 86 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14219</link>
      <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held to have abated because the assessee had availed the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and obtained immunity in respect of the penalty liability. On that basis, the court dismissed the application, treating the settlement and immunity under the scheme as dispositive of the penalty dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>