<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1475 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366003</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to disregard the value of unaccounted purchases and impose additional tax based on notional sales was partially upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the quantum of additional stocks was set aside, reinstating the Commissioner&#039;s findings. However, the Tribunal&#039;s treatment of the additional stocks&#039; value as additional income for tax assessment was upheld, aligning with established legal principles. The judgment clarified the distinction between assessing additional income based on undisclosed purchases and the profit element within those transactions, ensuring a fair tax assessment process. The appeals were disposed of with modifications to the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1475 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366003</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to disregard the value of unaccounted purchases and impose additional tax based on notional sales was partially upheld. The Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the quantum of additional stocks was set aside, reinstating the Commissioner&#039;s findings. However, the Tribunal&#039;s treatment of the additional stocks&#039; value as additional income for tax assessment was upheld, aligning with established legal principles. The judgment clarified the distinction between assessing additional income based on undisclosed purchases and the profit element within those transactions, ensuring a fair tax assessment process. The appeals were disposed of with modifications to the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>