https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366000 The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the limited scope of interference under Section 254(2) compared to Section 260A. The petitioner was allowed to address all concerns in the forthcoming appeal against the previous order dated 25th August, 2017. The court highlighted the importance of avoiding redundant proceedings and cited relevant procedural rules. The dismissal of the writ petition was clarified not to prejudice the petitioner's rights in the pending appeal, without expressing any opinion on the underlying merits. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:20:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366000 The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the limited scope of interference under Section 254(2) compared to Section 260A. The petitioner was allowed to address all concerns in the forthcoming appeal against the previous order dated 25th August, 2017. The court highlighted the importance of avoiding redundant proceedings and cited relevant procedural rules. The dismissal of the writ petition was clarified not to prejudice the petitioner's rights in the pending appeal, without expressing any opinion on the underlying merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366000