<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1463 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365991</link>
    <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 30.08.2017 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD. The Tribunal found that the issue had already been decided in the previous order, referencing a judgment of the High Court of Madras. The appellant&#039;s attempt to re-argue the matter under the guise of rectification was deemed unacceptable. The judgment was pronounced on 19/7/18 by Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1463 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365991</link>
      <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 30.08.2017 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD. The Tribunal found that the issue had already been decided in the previous order, referencing a judgment of the High Court of Madras. The appellant&#039;s attempt to re-argue the matter under the guise of rectification was deemed unacceptable. The judgment was pronounced on 19/7/18 by Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>