https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365989 The appeal before the CESTAT Hyderabad was filed by the revenue against Order-in-Original No.01/2009-ST. The Tribunal proceeded with the appeal despite the absence of respondent representation, citing the issue's narrow scope and vintage. The appeal challenged the combined hearings for two show cause notices. Subsequent to the initial order, another order was confirmed and later set aside by the Tribunal, rendering the current appeal infructuous. After reviewing the case history and subsequent developments, the Tribunal dismissed Appeal No.ST/470/2009 as it had lost relevance and purpose. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:19:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365989 The appeal before the CESTAT Hyderabad was filed by the revenue against Order-in-Original No.01/2009-ST. The Tribunal proceeded with the appeal despite the absence of respondent representation, citing the issue's narrow scope and vintage. The appeal challenged the combined hearings for two show cause notices. Subsequent to the initial order, another order was confirmed and later set aside by the Tribunal, rendering the current appeal infructuous. After reviewing the case history and subsequent developments, the Tribunal dismissed Appeal No.ST/470/2009 as it had lost relevance and purpose. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365989