<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on the gross taxable value received by the appellant, imposed penalties under Sections 77 and 78 for evasion, and rejected challenges against the extended period for tax demand. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed except for the demand related to concessional HSD supply, which was dropped. The court pronounced the decision, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on the gross taxable value received by the appellant, imposed penalties under Sections 77 and 78 for evasion, and rejected challenges against the extended period for tax demand. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed except for the demand related to concessional HSD supply, which was dropped. The court pronounced the decision, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>