<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1449 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365977</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit reversed before issuance of the show cause notice could not support recovery or penalty on the stated facts. The analysis applied precedents recognising that, once the disputed credit stood reversed pre-notice, there was no sustainable basis for a demand or penal action. The demand and penalty were therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1449 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365977</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit reversed before issuance of the show cause notice could not support recovery or penalty on the stated facts. The analysis applied precedents recognising that, once the disputed credit stood reversed pre-notice, there was no sustainable basis for a demand or penal action. The demand and penalty were therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>