<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to take cenvat credit despite a discrepancy in the bills of entry related to the PAN number of the Director. As the goods received were the same for which duty was demanded, the Tribunal emphasized receipt of goods in the factory over the PAN number discrepancy. Consequently, no duty liability remained, leading to no penalty being imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to take cenvat credit despite a discrepancy in the bills of entry related to the PAN number of the Director. As the goods received were the same for which duty was demanded, the Tribunal emphasized receipt of goods in the factory over the PAN number discrepancy. Consequently, no duty liability remained, leading to no penalty being imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>