<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1444 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365972</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the respondent in a dispute over the valuation of P or P Medicaments for Central Excise Duty between July 2002 to March 2005. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, determining that the valuation based on the cost of production and profit margin, as per the agreement between the parties, was appropriate. The Tribunal found the evidence supported the respondent&#039;s position, concluding that the Revenue&#039;s appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1444 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365972</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the respondent in a dispute over the valuation of P or P Medicaments for Central Excise Duty between July 2002 to March 2005. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, determining that the valuation based on the cost of production and profit margin, as per the agreement between the parties, was appropriate. The Tribunal found the evidence supported the respondent&#039;s position, concluding that the Revenue&#039;s appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>