<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 5 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s plea, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejecting the reference application filed by the Revenue under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessing authority&#039;s additions regarding the yield of rice and its by-products, leading to the deletion of the addition sustained by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on account of alleged suppressed yield of rice. Relief allowed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the yield of rice bran and husk was upheld by the Tribunal, which found the calculations fair and reasonable, with no legal errors identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 5 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s plea, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejecting the reference application filed by the Revenue under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessing authority&#039;s additions regarding the yield of rice and its by-products, leading to the deletion of the addition sustained by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on account of alleged suppressed yield of rice. Relief allowed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the yield of rice bran and husk was upheld by the Tribunal, which found the calculations fair and reasonable, with no legal errors identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>