https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365933 The High Court partially allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the second respondent's order refusing to entertain the appeal solely based on the delay of 13 days. The Court remitted the matter back to the second respondent for a decision on the appeal's merits within eight weeks. The Court refrained from delving into the specifics of the first respondent's order, emphasizing that statutory appellate remedies must be exhausted in fiscal matters. The Court found the reasons provided by the petitioner for the delay in filing the appeal to be valid and unjustified, opining that the delay should have been condoned. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365933 The High Court partially allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the second respondent's order refusing to entertain the appeal solely based on the delay of 13 days. The Court remitted the matter back to the second respondent for a decision on the appeal's merits within eight weeks. The Court refrained from delving into the specifics of the first respondent's order, emphasizing that statutory appellate remedies must be exhausted in fiscal matters. The Court found the reasons provided by the petitioner for the delay in filing the appeal to be valid and unjustified, opining that the delay should have been condoned. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365933