<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1399 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that after the appellant reversed the CENVAT Credit on exempted services and paid interest, the department could not proceed for further recovery under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or impose penalties. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, granting relief to the appellant based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1399 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that after the appellant reversed the CENVAT Credit on exempted services and paid interest, the department could not proceed for further recovery under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or impose penalties. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, granting relief to the appellant based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>