<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, an educational institution, was not liable for service tax under manpower recruitment services as the charges were part of the fee structure and not specifically for recruitment. Regarding online information services, it was determined that the liability rested with a separate legal entity, not the appellant, and the services were for educational purposes, exempt from taxation. The demand for short-payment of service tax was found unsustainable, and the penalties were waived due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1397 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, an educational institution, was not liable for service tax under manpower recruitment services as the charges were part of the fee structure and not specifically for recruitment. Regarding online information services, it was determined that the liability rested with a separate legal entity, not the appellant, and the services were for educational purposes, exempt from taxation. The demand for short-payment of service tax was found unsustainable, and the penalties were waived due to the appellant&#039;s genuine belief. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>