https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365921 The court quashes the impugned order (Exhibit P3) under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, directing re-consideration of the Revision Application due to procedural irregularities impacting benefit eligibility for rebate on input for imported raw materials. The judgment emphasizes the need to address and specify the procedural irregularities hindering the first respondent's entitlement to rebate, cenvat credit, or cash refund of Counter Veiling Duty (CVD), stressing fair hearing and compliance with procedural requirements. en-us Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365921 The court quashes the impugned order (Exhibit P3) under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, directing re-consideration of the Revision Application due to procedural irregularities impacting benefit eligibility for rebate on input for imported raw materials. The judgment emphasizes the need to address and specify the procedural irregularities hindering the first respondent's entitlement to rebate, cenvat credit, or cash refund of Counter Veiling Duty (CVD), stressing fair hearing and compliance with procedural requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365921