<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365914</link>
    <description>Clearances to SEZ units are treated as deemed exports, so accumulated unutilised Cenvat credit arising from such clearances was eligible for refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The contrary view that refund was not admissible for supplies to SEZ units and other exempt destinations was found unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and refund of the unutilised credit was held payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365914</link>
      <description>Clearances to SEZ units are treated as deemed exports, so accumulated unutilised Cenvat credit arising from such clearances was eligible for refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The contrary view that refund was not admissible for supplies to SEZ units and other exempt destinations was found unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and refund of the unutilised credit was held payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>