https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365910 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of abatement under Rule 96ZP(2) due to the appellant's choice of lump sum duty payment under Rule 96ZP(3), following established legal interpretations and precedents from higher courts. The Tribunal concluded that the order of the adjudicating authority was valid, dismissing the appellant's appeal in line with relevant rules and court judgments. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365910 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of abatement under Rule 96ZP(2) due to the appellant's choice of lump sum duty payment under Rule 96ZP(3), following established legal interpretations and precedents from higher courts. The Tribunal concluded that the order of the adjudicating authority was valid, dismissing the appellant's appeal in line with relevant rules and court judgments. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365910