<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order regarding the imposition of penalties under Rules 15(1) and 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant&#039;s appeal was denied as they were found to have fraudulently availed CENVAT Credit without receiving the inputs. The Tribunal held that reconsidering the penalty would amount to a review of the original order, citing legal principles established by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the rectification application was deemed meritless and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order regarding the imposition of penalties under Rules 15(1) and 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant&#039;s appeal was denied as they were found to have fraudulently availed CENVAT Credit without receiving the inputs. The Tribunal held that reconsidering the penalty would amount to a review of the original order, citing legal principles established by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the rectification application was deemed meritless and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>