<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365899</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions, quashing the adverse findings and emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity of hearing before adverse orders are passed. The judgment clarified the procedural requirements and conditions for re-assessment under the Income Tax Act, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1371 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365899</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions, quashing the adverse findings and emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity of hearing before adverse orders are passed. The judgment clarified the procedural requirements and conditions for re-assessment under the Income Tax Act, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>