<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1367 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee based on the lack of evidence supporting the imposition of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the necessity of positive evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars to justify penalties, citing past judgments to support the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1367 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee based on the lack of evidence supporting the imposition of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the necessity of positive evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars to justify penalties, citing past judgments to support the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>