<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment primarily focused on the applicability of section 50C to a leasehold property, directing a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. The valuation of the property for capital gains calculation and determination of long term capital gain on the inherited property were not extensively discussed. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment considering the leasehold nature of the property and relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1361 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment primarily focused on the applicability of section 50C to a leasehold property, directing a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer. The valuation of the property for capital gains calculation and determination of long term capital gain on the inherited property were not extensively discussed. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment considering the leasehold nature of the property and relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>