<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1354 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365882</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order, which reduced the penalty from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs, was found justified based on the roles of the individuals involved in the illegal export of foreign currency. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding excessive penalty compared to others, lack of cross-examination opportunities, and coercion in making statements were dismissed. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s decision as reasonable and no substantial question of law arose, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the maintenance of the penalty reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1354 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365882</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order, which reduced the penalty from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs, was found justified based on the roles of the individuals involved in the illegal export of foreign currency. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding excessive penalty compared to others, lack of cross-examination opportunities, and coercion in making statements were dismissed. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s decision as reasonable and no substantial question of law arose, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the maintenance of the penalty reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>