https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365878 The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the importance of fair hearing, cross-examination, and examination of witnesses in quasi-judicial proceedings. It highlighted the discretion of the adjudicating authority in permitting evidence and cross-examination, stating that approaching the court under Article 226 before the conclusion of proceedings was premature. The judgment underscored the significance of natural justice principles and the need for flexibility in their application based on individual case circumstances. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365878 The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing the importance of fair hearing, cross-examination, and examination of witnesses in quasi-judicial proceedings. It highlighted the discretion of the adjudicating authority in permitting evidence and cross-examination, stating that approaching the court under Article 226 before the conclusion of proceedings was premature. The judgment underscored the significance of natural justice principles and the need for flexibility in their application based on individual case circumstances. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365878