<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365873</link>
    <description>In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter, the dispute was stated to have been settled after the High Court judgment and the cheque amount had been received. In those peculiar facts and circumstances, the Supreme Court considered it appropriate to give the dispute a quietus and do complete justice between the parties. The conviction and sentence were set aside, the appeals were allowed, and costs were directed to be paid to the State Legal Services Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1345 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365873</link>
      <description>In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter, the dispute was stated to have been settled after the High Court judgment and the cheque amount had been received. In those peculiar facts and circumstances, the Supreme Court considered it appropriate to give the dispute a quietus and do complete justice between the parties. The conviction and sentence were set aside, the appeals were allowed, and costs were directed to be paid to the State Legal Services Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>