<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1341 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and remanding the case for fresh adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals) in Nagpur. The judgment emphasized the significance of complying with procedural requirements and ensuring parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case and evidence in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1341 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and remanding the case for fresh adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals) in Nagpur. The judgment emphasized the significance of complying with procedural requirements and ensuring parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case and evidence in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>