https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365856 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a dispute over availing CENVAT credit for common inputs services used in manufacturing and trading activities. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that non-compliance with Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 did not disentitle the respondent from claiming the credit. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing that the respondent was not liable to pay the amount under Rule 6. The decision was based on established legal principles and lack of contradictory rulings from higher judicial forums. en-us Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:26:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365856 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a dispute over availing CENVAT credit for common inputs services used in manufacturing and trading activities. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that non-compliance with Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 did not disentitle the respondent from claiming the credit. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing that the respondent was not liable to pay the amount under Rule 6. The decision was based on established legal principles and lack of contradictory rulings from higher judicial forums. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365856