<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1251 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal held that the penalty notice did not specify the exact nature of the violation, following a legal precedent where such notices were deemed invalid if not specific. As a result, the penalty was found unsustainable, and in favor of the assessee, the penalty was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1251 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal held that the penalty notice did not specify the exact nature of the violation, following a legal precedent where such notices were deemed invalid if not specific. As a result, the penalty was found unsustainable, and in favor of the assessee, the penalty was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>