<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1357 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274630</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad allowed the Standing Counsel to seek instructions following the filing of a supplementary affidavit introducing new facts in a case involving the incorrect interpretation of entry and exit dates of a vehicle in the TDF form. The applicant contended that the valuation of goods was inaccurate and provided evidence to support their claim. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 23.1.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1357 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274630</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad allowed the Standing Counsel to seek instructions following the filing of a supplementary affidavit introducing new facts in a case involving the incorrect interpretation of entry and exit dates of a vehicle in the TDF form. The applicant contended that the valuation of goods was inaccurate and provided evidence to support their claim. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 23.1.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>