<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Revenue. It was determined that the suppliers had the discretion to charge interest, and the assessee was not obligated to provide for such contingencies. The deduction for interest payable/paid was allowed, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Revenue. It was determined that the suppliers had the discretion to charge interest, and the assessee was not obligated to provide for such contingencies. The deduction for interest payable/paid was allowed, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>