<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1301 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365829</link>
    <description>Rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act is available to correct apparent mistakes in a final order, including typographical errors in the respondent&#039;s name, address, and stated figure, where the correction is confined to the record and does not involve review of the appeal on merits. The application was allowed, and the final order was amended by substituting the correct respondent particulars and the amount recorded in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 02:13:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1301 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365829</link>
      <description>Rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act is available to correct apparent mistakes in a final order, including typographical errors in the respondent&#039;s name, address, and stated figure, where the correction is confined to the record and does not involve review of the appeal on merits. The application was allowed, and the final order was amended by substituting the correct respondent particulars and the amount recorded in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>