https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365824 The Criminal Appeal was filed against the acquittal of the accused by the Appellate Court under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act. The Trial Court convicted the accused based on evidence presented by the complainant, but the Appellate Court questioned the validity of the evidence and found discrepancies. The case focused on the authenticity and nexus between the complainant and the accused firms, with concerns raised about the reliability of presented documents. Ultimately, the Appellate Court acquitted the accused due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of clear evidence establishing liability, emphasizing the importance of credible evidence in such cases. en-us Sat, 11 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2018 02:13:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365824 The Criminal Appeal was filed against the acquittal of the accused by the Appellate Court under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act. The Trial Court convicted the accused based on evidence presented by the complainant, but the Appellate Court questioned the validity of the evidence and found discrepancies. The case focused on the authenticity and nexus between the complainant and the accused firms, with concerns raised about the reliability of presented documents. Ultimately, the Appellate Court acquitted the accused due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of clear evidence establishing liability, emphasizing the importance of credible evidence in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 11 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365824