https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365823 The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the mandatory waiting period under Section 138(c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act before filing a complaint, even if the drawer denies liability. Due to conflicting views on the effect of denial of liability on the cause of action, the court referred the matter to a Division Bench for clarification, highlighting the need for an authoritative pronouncement on the issue. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365823 The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the mandatory waiting period under Section 138(c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act before filing a complaint, even if the drawer denies liability. Due to conflicting views on the effect of denial of liability on the cause of action, the court referred the matter to a Division Bench for clarification, highlighting the need for an authoritative pronouncement on the issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365823