<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1294 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365822</link>
    <description>In pending cheque dishonour prosecutions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, a Magistrate cannot direct interim refund or restitution of settlement money voluntarily paid under a mediation settlement before liability is finally adjudicated. The payment was made pursuant to the parties&#039; settlement, while the underlying liability on the dishonoured cheques still remained for trial determination. A criminal court cannot be turned into a forum for mid-proceeding recovery of the settlement amount; any restitutionary relief, if warranted, can arise only at final adjudication. The refund direction was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving liability to be decided in the pending proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 02:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=531846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1294 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365822</link>
      <description>In pending cheque dishonour prosecutions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, a Magistrate cannot direct interim refund or restitution of settlement money voluntarily paid under a mediation settlement before liability is finally adjudicated. The payment was made pursuant to the parties&#039; settlement, while the underlying liability on the dishonoured cheques still remained for trial determination. A criminal court cannot be turned into a forum for mid-proceeding recovery of the settlement amount; any restitutionary relief, if warranted, can arise only at final adjudication. The refund direction was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving liability to be decided in the pending proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>