https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365820 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner could be arrested in connection with the investigation of service tax evasion as per the provisions of the Finance Act. The court held that the petitioner's resignation from directorship did not absolve him of liability for the company's service tax dues accrued during his tenure. Additionally, the court found that a "Deed of Settlement" with co-directors could not exempt the petitioner from statutory obligations. The petition was dismissed, and any interim order was vacated. en-us Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365820 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner could be arrested in connection with the investigation of service tax evasion as per the provisions of the Finance Act. The court held that the petitioner's resignation from directorship did not absolve him of liability for the company's service tax dues accrued during his tenure. Additionally, the court found that a "Deed of Settlement" with co-directors could not exempt the petitioner from statutory obligations. The petition was dismissed, and any interim order was vacated. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365820