https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365810 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the service tax liability for amounts received during July to September 2004 was not taxable. The appeal against the Adjudication order for this period was accepted, setting aside the penalties. For the period September 2004 to January 2007, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's request for re-quantification based on cum tax value, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for reassessment following principles of natural justice. The Revenue's appeal was rejected for the earlier period but allowed for the subsequent period, leading to the disposal of both appeals accordingly. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2018 02:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365810 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the service tax liability for amounts received during July to September 2004 was not taxable. The appeal against the Adjudication order for this period was accepted, setting aside the penalties. For the period September 2004 to January 2007, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's request for re-quantification based on cum tax value, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for reassessment following principles of natural justice. The Revenue's appeal was rejected for the earlier period but allowed for the subsequent period, leading to the disposal of both appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365810